Table of Contents |
Credibility is defined as the objective and subjective components of the believability of a source or message. Credibility is both objective, or based on facts and evidence, and subjective, based on opinions and feelings.
This quality encompasses everything from your college degree or professional certification to the immediate "gut feeling" people get when they walk into the room. You employ your credibility when you make an appeal using ethos.
The subjective aspect of a public speaker's credibility is based on the speaker's self-presentation. Here are some tips for earning credibility on a subjective level:
Mark Twain once said that an expert is just "an ordinary fellow from another town." If only it were that easy! In reality, if you want to convince the audience that you are an expert, you will have to show some credentials.
Here are three ways to establish objective credibility:
The following are the types and elements of credibility that will matter to your audience.
The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him.—Niccolo Machiavelli
Greek philosopher Heraclitus's famous maxim, "Character is destiny," has echoed through the ages: If you want to win the audience's trust, you must demonstrate that you are a person of character.
Aristotle argues that establishing good character is one of the most important means of persuasion. Roman orator Quintilian defines persuasive rhetoric as essentially "the good man speaking well."
British historian James A. Froude takes the colloquial idea of building character one step further, leading us to imagine a laborious undertaking in a blacksmith's forge, shaping character with a hammer.
The literature surrounding public speaking emphasizes the importance of establishing good character but also admits that it is not easy.
Personal character is an important addition to the elements of credibility we discussed in the last segment. However, it is important to note that, for a public speaker, character is not as simple as being a nice person or a law-abiding citizen.
Public speakers are responsible for communicating something of value to a large group of people. A public speaker of character should listen to the needs of the audience, entertain potential objections, walk the audience through opposing viewpoints, and respond to questions. Show your listeners that you're looking out for them. After all, why should they trust you if you don't care about them?
Speeches grounded in the principles of rhetoric focus on three types of rhetorical appeals: logos, pathos, and ethos.
While logos and pathos appeal to reason and emotion, respectively, ethos takes on a decidedly different approach entirely. Speakers using ethos seek to persuade their audience by demonstrating their own credibility and authority.
To elaborate, the construction of authority is reflected in how a speaker presents themselves, what diction they use, how they phrase their ideas, what other authorities they refer to, how they compose themselves under stress, their experience within the context of their message, and their personal or academic background.
Obviously, if you elucidate a persuasive portrait of your personal credibility and authority, you make a more persuasive case for the credibility and authority of your words. However, when building a persuasive case using ethos, it may be tempting to stray into territory that borders on the unethical.
IN CONTEXT
You might not realize it at first, but interviewing for a job is an abbreviated form of persuasive speaking. You're trying to persuade an employer to offer you a job. This method of persuasion relies heavily on the use of ethos, as you're trying to make your case as to why you're the best person for the job.
When you submit your résumé and cover letter, you provide your potential employer with an overview of your skills, experiences, and background, and how they best fit with the position and company with whom you seek employment.
While many employers complete extensive background reviews and reference checks, they may not follow up with every single bullet point on your résumé. While it might be tempting to beef up your list of achievements by stretching the truth: naming yourself a college club president as opposed to a member, listing an award you may have been nominated for but not won (without clarifying that fact)—these are all unethical ways of padding your résumé, and thus, unethically using ethos to persuade your potential employer to hire you for the job.
This same example holds true in more formal scenarios of persuasive public speaking. It is unethical to lie to your audience about who you are and what you bring to the table in terms of experience, credibility, and authority. It is equally unethical to even bend the truth on the slightest detail about what makes you a credible or authoritative speaker on your given subject.
Source: THIS TUTORIAL HAS BEEN ADAPTED FROM "BOUNDLESS COMMUNICATIONS" PROVIDED BY BOUNDLESS.COM. ACCESS FOR FREE AT oer commons. LICENSED UNDER CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION-SHAREALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL.