Use Sophia to knock out your gen-ed requirements quickly and affordably. Learn more
×

Thinking Scientifically

Author: Sophia

what's covered
In this lesson, you will learn about how to think skeptically and scientifically, and the importance of hypothesis testing. Specifically, this lesson will cover:

Table of Contents

make the connection
If you are taking the Human Biology Lab course simultaneously with this lecture, it's a good time to review the first unit of that course. Not taking the course and want to know more? See the Human Biology Lab course in Sophia's Science Course List.

1. Welcome to Human Biology

Welcome to Human Biology, an introduction to fundamental biological principles from a human perspective. Humans are complex, and the scientific study of human biology examines the anatomy, physiology, genetics, evolution, and ecology of humans. In particular, understanding how humans function can provide insight into human health and approaches that can be used to stay healthy. This course is intended as a basic overview for those interested in learning more about the human body.

In this course, you will learn about the molecular and cellular basis of life, genetics, organ systems, and the impact of nutrition and exercise on human health. The organ systems covered in this course are the integumentary, skeletal, muscular, nervous, endocrine, circulatory, lymphatic, immune, respiratory, digestive, urinary, and reproductive systems.

After completing this course, you are expected to understand the basic organization of the body, anatomical terminology, the organization of covered organ systems and their function in serving the body, and the foundations of related diseases and conditions.

A Human Biology Lab course is aligned with this Human Biology lecture course outline. Links to relevant lab Activities will be made available within the Human Biology lecture course to reinforce the relationship between theory and skills.


2. Thinking Scientifically

You walk into your house after a long day of work. As soon as you open the door, you feel a blast of heat through the open door. You wonder: “What is wrong?” Immediately, your brain starts thinking of scenarios. Did you forget to program the air conditioner to come on before you got home? Is your air conditioner broken? Is your power out? Is there a fire?

What you have just done is an example of the scientific method, which is the process that scientists use to understand the natural world. You observed something, and then you asked a bunch of questions. Now, what are you going to do? Check the power? Check the air conditioner? Check your smoke alarms? Look for signs of a fire? All of this is part of the scientific method, which you will learn more about later in this lesson.

However, before we can understand the scientific method, we need to understand science and how scientists think or approach a problem. Science is a process that humans use to understand their surroundings and how they work, through testable experiments, which are tests set up to explain a phenomenon. It is a way of knowing how the natural world and our universe work. Science tries to do this by testing and explaining physical laws about the way the universe works.

terms to know
Science
A process that humans use to understand their surroundings and how they work, through testable experiments.
Experiment
A test set up to explain a phenomenon.

2a. Critical Thinking and Being Skeptical

Critical thinking is the process of rationally and skeptically evaluating facts without any biases to make a judgment on those facts. Critical thinking is a crucial skill for all people, not just scientists. A person is critically thinking when they analyze a source of information, assess its validity, and improve their own understanding of the topic in the process. Critical thinkers are skeptical and open-minded and will change positions when evidence and reason lead them to do so.

try it
Directions: Do you think critically? Below are some typical questions that are used to test critical thinking. Click on the questions to reveal the answers.
Do they have the Fourth of July in England?
Yes, England has the day, but they just don’t celebrate July 4th the way people in the U.S. celebrate it.
How many birthdays does the average person have?
You have just one birthday, the day you are born.
If there are three apples and you take away two, how many do you have?
You have two apples since you took two of them.
I have two U.S. coins totaling 55 cents. One is not a nickel. What are the coins?
You have a 50-cent piece and a nickel. One of them is NOT a nickel, it is a 50-cent piece, but the other one is a nickel.
How many books can you put in an empty bag?
One: Once you put one book in a bag, it is no longer empty.


A dogma is a principle or set of principles set by an authority that is considered true with certainty and without question. For example, dogmas are commonly religious, political, or based on beliefs, faith, personal convictions, or opinions. Dogmatism can be problematic when individuals ignore evidence that does not support their beliefs or values. This can result in confirmatory bias, in which individuals ignore evidence that goes against their beliefs and favor information that confirms or supports their beliefs.

Although skepticism might have a bad connotation in day-to-day conversation, it does not have that same connotation in the sciences. To be skeptical is to not accept facts as they are presented but to have doubts or reservations until the facts can be verified. It does not mean you think a person is a liar or that they are trying to fool or trick you. It just means that you should always question facts that are presented to you without proof of their veracity until you can verify those facts.

think about it
When should you be skeptical about a fact? Look at the examples below and think about when you should judge the facts skeptically.
  1. Roses smell better than tulips.
  2. Trees produce oxygen.
  3. Elephants are larger in size than lions.
  4. Dogs make better pets than cats.
  5. Pineapple belongs on all pizzas.

terms to know
Critical Thinking
The process of rationally and skeptically evaluating facts without any biases to make a judgment on those facts.
Dogma
A principle or set of principles set by an authority that is considered true with certainty and without question.
Confirmatory Bias
The tendency to seek out and favor information that confirms or supports an individual’s beliefs or values.
Skepticism
To not accept facts as they are presented but to have doubts or reservations until the facts can be verified.

2b. Terms Used in Properly Evaluating Scientific Information

The following are important terms that will help you to understand how to properly evaluate scientific information.

Term Definition Example
Fact A fact is verifiable information. A fact is something that you know is true and that you can verify. It is 100°F outside today. That is something that you can prove is true and that you can verify with, for example, a thermometer.
Opinion An opinion is something that is based on personal judgment and might not be based on fact. It's something that a person themself is judging. An opinion based on that fact that it is 100°F might be that it is hot outside. This is based on personal judgment, and it could vary from person to person. One person might think that 100°F is hot, but another person might not.
Bias A bias is a swayed opinion. It's based off an opinion but is swayed due to someone's personal experience. If you live in Minnesota, your opinion may be that Minnesota is the best state. This is a swayed opinion based on your personal experience because that's where you live.

terms to know
Fact
A piece of information known to be true and that can be verified.
Opinion
A piece of information that involves personal judgment.
Bias
An opinion swayed by personal experience.

2c. Ensuring Credible Information

When you're evaluating information and trying to figure out if that information is credible, you need to look at a few key points. Credible information should always be:

  • Peer reviewed
  • Thoroughly checked with a reliable source
  • Backed by scientific evidence
When evaluating information, it is also important to consider if it is from a primary or secondary source. Primary data sources are typically defined as original and in some way conducted or collected primarily by a researcher. In the sciences, primary data are commonly published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and books.

Secondary sources are at least one step removed: They rely on sources other than direct observation or experience and build upon primary sources to provide perspective and analysis. They include, but are not limited to, most articles online or in databases and textbooks (which are sometimes classified as tertiary sources because, like encyclopedias and other reference works, their primary purpose might be to summarize or otherwise condense information).

Information from primary sources is typically considered more reliable and accurate because it is from a firsthand account of a researcher rather than an interpretation of others.

try it
Directions: Based on the key points of credible information, try to answer the following questions.
How do you know if a source is reliable or not?
When you're trying to figure out if the information is credible, you should always think critically about that information or about the source of the information. Thinking critically means using systematic strategies to help judge that information.
If you were looking up information, would a scientific journal be more credible, or would Wikipedia be more credible?
We know it would be a scientific journal because that has been peer reviewed, thoroughly checked, and backed by scientific evidence. Wikipedia is more of a public domain area.
If you're looking up information on cancer, would you get credible information by going to a friend, or do you think that information would be more credible coming from the American Cancer Society website?
It would be the American Cancer Society website. Again, we know that information is peer reviewed, thoroughly checked, and backed by scientific evidence. Your friend's information might involve some opinion or some bias, whereas the American Cancer Society website is based strictly on facts. That's the difference between finding credible information and information that might not be as credible.

term to know
Observation
Something that you see, hear, or experience, and involves using your senses to take in information about your surroundings.


3. Scientific Hypotheses, Theories, and Laws

Information that is based on observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic is called empirical evidence. There is no single route to answering a question or explaining an observation, but there is an aspect common to every approach—each uses knowledge based on experiments that can be reproduced to verify the results. Some routes involve a hypothesis, a tentative explanation of observations that acts as a guide for gathering and checking information.

The laws of science summarize a vast number of experimental observations and describe or predict some facet of the natural world. Scientific theories are well-substantiated, comprehensive, testable explanations of particular aspects of nature. Theories are accepted because they provide satisfactory explanations, but they can be modified if new data becomes available.

A scientific hypothesis is testable. Testable means that you can construct a method to determine whether the hypothesis is supported. A testable hypothesis must be measured against natural laws. For example, if I proposed that the lab is cold because a witch put a spell on the air conditioner unit, that would not be testable. I could not test whether a spell is on the unit.

A scientific hypothesis is also falsifiable. Falsifiable refers to the ability of a hypothesis to be disproven. A falsifiable hypothesis is often described as having a true or false outcome. However, in reality, not all tested hypotheses result in absolute truth; most of the time, the hypothesis is either supported or not supported (falsified).

The path of discovery that leads from question and observation to law, or hypothesis to theory, combined with experimental verification of the hypothesis and any necessary modification of the theory, is called the scientific method. The scientific method is a set of guidelines, created by Sir Francis Bacon in 1580, that scientists use to help explain a phenomenon and arrive at reliable results.

The image below shows a schematic of the scientific method and how this process informs theories and laws:

A schematic of the scientific method and how this process informs theories and laws.

Scientific theories often use the scientific method to explain a phenomenon, but experiments need to be tested many times, and under many conditions, and get the same results. Repeating experiments over and over and getting the same results every time means that you know that when you call something a scientific theory, you believe it to be true because it has been tested many times.

EXAMPLE

An example of a scientific theory is the theory of natural selection. Charles Darwin came up with this theory after he tested his research over and over and over again, on many different organisms, so many times that he could actually believe it to be true.

terms to know
Empirical Evidence
Information that is based on observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.
Hypothesis
A tentative explanation of observations that acts as a guide for gathering and checking information.
Laws of Science
A summary of a vast number of experimental observations that describes or predicts some facet of the natural world.
Scientific Theory
A well-substantiated, comprehensive, testable explanation of particular aspects of nature.
Testable
A method can be constructed to determine whether the hypothesis is supported.
Falsifiable
The ability of a hypothesis to be disproven.
Scientific Method
The path of discovery that leads from question and observation to law, or hypothesis to theory, combined with experimental verification of the hypothesis and any necessary modification of the theory.

3a. Hypotheses vs. Theories

It is easy to confuse a hypothesis and a theory. Although they are both related to the scientific method, they are very different things. Recall that a hypothesis is a tentative explanation of observations that acts as a guide for gathering and checking information. Scientific theories are widely accepted explanations of natural phenomena that have been extensively tested.

When people say they have a theory about something, they almost always mean they have a hypothesis about something. To the everyday person, a theory is a thought they have that has not been proven. To a scientist, a theory has been proven at the highest level possible using scientific research. A theory is as strong a proof of something as any law of nature.

3b. Theories vs. Laws

It is also easy to confuse law and theory. Physical laws are things that apply universally in nature. They are fixed and do not change. A law summarizes a vast number of experimental observations and describes or predicts some facet of the natural world. Scientific theories are widely accepted, well-tested explanations of natural phenomena. Scientific theories can be adjusted or changed if new facts or explanations are discovered.

This does not mean a law is more important or more proven than a theory. Theories and laws are both the highest level of proof in the scientific world; they just relate to different things. A law is the description (often mathematical) of an observation. A law does not explain why something happens or what caused it to happen. A theory is an explanation of observation and explains what happens and what causes it to happen.

Augmented Reality in Human Biology

Augmented reality, or AR, is a technology that blends physical and digital worlds. AR enhances your real-world environment by overlaying digital objects or information on top of it using a mobile device. You will have the opportunity to use AR to supplement some of the figures and charts in this course. Using the AR resources is not required but may enhance your learning experience. To use AR, you will need a phone or tablet with a camera and browser. Then, look for QR codes like this one throughout the course. Give AR a try and learn a few tips and tricks by scanning the code.

If you’re on a laptop or desktop computer: Scan the QR code using the camera on your smartphone or tablet.

If you are on a phone or tablet, click here.

summary
In this welcome to human biology, you learned what it means to think scientifically and how scientists (and everyone) can use critical thinking to be skeptical about the facts that are presented to you every day and to not just accept the facts without verifying them. Next, you learned about the terms used in properly evaluating scientific information that will help you to understand how to properly evaluate sources. Finally, you learned to consider a few key points to look for when ensuring credible information, and you learned how to differentiate between scientific hypotheses, theories, and laws.

SOURCE: THIS TUTORIAL HAS BEEN ADAPTED FROM (1) OPENSTAX “BIOLOGY 2E”. ACCESS FOR FREE AT OPENSTAX.ORG/BOOKS/BIOLOGY-2E/PAGES/1-INTRODUCTION (2) OPENSTAX “WRITING GUIDE WITH HANDBOOK”. ACCESS FOR FREE AT OPENSTAX.ORG/BOOKS/WRITING-GUIDE/PAGES/1-UNIT-INTRODUCTION (3) OPENSTAX “PSYCHOLOGY 2E”. ACCESS FOR FREE AT OPENSTAX.ORG/BOOKS/PSYCHOLOGY-2E/PAGES/1-INTRODUCTION. LICENSING (1, 2, & 3): CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4.0 INTERNATIONAL.

Terms to Know
Bias

An opinion swayed by personal experience.

Confirmatory Bias

The tendency to seek out and favor information that confirms or supports an individual’s beliefs or values.

Critical Thinking

The process of rationally and skeptically evaluating facts without any biases to make a judgment on those facts.

Dogma

A principle or set of principles set by an authority that is considered true with certainty and without question.

Empirical Evidence

Information that is based on observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.

Experiment

A test set up to explain a phenomenon.

Fact

A piece of information known to be true and that can be verified.

Falsifiable

The ability of a hypothesis to be disproven.

Hypothesis

A tentative explanation of observations that acts as a guide for gathering and checking information.

Laws of Science

A summary of a vast number of experimental observations that describes or predicts some facet of the natural world.

Observation

Something that you see, hear, or experience, and involves using your senses to take in information about your surroundings.

Opinion

A piece of information that involves personal judgment.

Science

A process that humans use to understand their surroundings and how they work, through testable experiments.

Scientific Method

The path of discovery that leads from question and observation to law, or hypothesis to theory, combined with experimental verification of the hypothesis and any necessary modification of the theory.

Scientific Theory

A well-substantiated, comprehensive, testable explanation of particular aspects of nature.

Skepticism

To not accept facts as they are presented but to have doubts or reservations until the facts can be verified.

Testable

A method can be constructed to determine whether the hypothesis is supported.