It is common knowledge that we pay taxes on many things. We pay taxes on our income at three levels--local, state, and federal. We also pay a lot of taxes on goods and services.
In economics, we consider how taxes alter the market outcome. By analyzing a graph, we notice how the equilibrium quantity being purchased or being supplied is impacted, as well as how the price we pay is affected.
Tax is defined as an additional cost of supply or purchase levied to alter consumer behavior and/or to increase government revenue. The purpose of a tax could be either to change our behavior to get us to buy less of something, or to increase government revenue, or a combination of the two.
Here is a basic graph of a tax. Let's assume that it represents the effect of taxing cigarettes, which is a common example of a tax. In the case of a tax, since it is an increased cost to the producer, the supply curve shifts to the left, with two results:
Looking at the graph above, the original equilibrium was at Q1 and P*.
With a decrease in supply comes movement along the demand curve, and the new market price being paid is Pc, as indicated on the graph.
However, the price that producers are actually going to receive is down at Pp, because the amount of the tax is the distance between the supply curves.
Notice we are purchasing a lower quantity as the price we pay rises, which is the law of demand. As prices go up, we buy a lower quantity.
Now, the next question is, who is actually impacted in this scenario? What is the tax incidence, which is the economic "burden" of tax? Is it the consumer or the producer? Is it a combination?
Generally, it is going to be a combination, but let's examine who bears more of the burden.
It certainly depends on the good or service, and it involves the concept of elasticity, which is the measurement of change in quantity demanded or supplied, showing the sensitivity of one variable to characteristics of another variable. In other words, how responsive is something to something else?
So, as we shift supply to the left to account for the amount of the tax, several things happen:
Even with that small increase in price, notice the change in quantity. This is because we, as consumers, are very responsive to the price change with elastic demand.
IN CONTEXT
Many items have different elasticities along their demand curve. Items like cigarettes and alcohol have relatively elastic demand at lower prices, but then relatively inelastic demand at higher prices.
When they raise the tax initially, it can generate a significant response in terms of consumers cutting back on buying cigarettes. Perhaps this reflects the people who were on the border, such as those who wanted to quit anyway or those casual smokers, who might cut back now that they have to pay a tax.
However, as that tax gets higher and higher and higher, we reach the inelastic portion of the demand curve for cigarettes. This is because these are the people who have not responded to the price change--and they are likely not going to respond to the price change.
They are addicted to cigarettes and will continue smoking, regardless of price. Therefore, the impact of the tax can be quite different as it gets higher and higher, because of the inherent characteristics of particular items.
A subsidy is a sum paid, typically by the government, to either suppliers or consumers to assist in the production or purchase of a good or service. The point of a subsidy is to get supply increased.
The effect of a subsidy is that the supply curve shifts to the right, as shown below. The initial price and quantity (P*, Q1) shift to its new point of equilibrium at (Pc, Q2).
The price that consumers are paying is now lower (Pc), while the price that producers are receiving--because the amount of the subsidy is the distance between the two supply curves--is higher, at Pp.
Now, let's go through the same exercise as before, although in this case, it is slightly different because the question is not about who is bearing the burden, but rather who collects the subsidies.
Source: Adapted from Sophia instructor Kate Eskra.