Table of Contents |
We will look at motivation from two lenses, beginning with content-based theories, which focus on what motivates people. In the next section, we will describe process-based theories, which focus on the psychological aspects of motivation and seek to explain why people may experience different levels of motivation when offered the same rewards.
EXAMPLE
David is highly motivated in his job as a clerk at a clothing store. Content theories would describe sources of his motivation like a paycheck, social recognition for his expertise, and his genuine interest in fashion. Process theories would focus on motivating factors like job design that reinforce his motivation through reward and promotion.Content theories of motivation are rooted in the work of Abraham Maslow, particularly the hierarchy of human needs. While this has since been critiqued and revised, it is good to know the origins of motivational theory. Maslow divided human needs into a hierarchy of importance and believed that needs must be satisfied in order, starting from the bottom physiological needs and then safety and security needs. That is, according to Maslow, people need to be fed and sheltered and feel safe before they can turn to deeper motivations like social needs (friendship, belonging), ego and esteem needs (recognition, a sense of importance) and finally, self-actualization (personal fulfillment, doing what one loves and feeling appreciated for it).
Image OM436a Maslow’s Pyramid (Check OB)
Caption: Maslow’s hierarchy of needs states lower-level needs, like psychological needs, must be met in order to move up the hierarchy.
![]()
Let’s see how Maria, as COO, might tend to the needs of her workers to make sure they are motivated and engaged.
- Maria ensures that workers are fairly compensated, have health care, and otherwise can have their basic needs met. She also needs to make sure they have breaks to eat, rest, and take care of personal needs. This tends to their long-term and short-term physiological needs so they are not distracted at the job.
- Maria sees to workers’ safety needs: The company provides protective equipment and clothing and implements safety protocols that go beyond legal compliance. In addition, the company ensures job security.
- Maria tries to cultivate a friendly work environment by recognizing and mitigating sources of conflict, encouraging small talk on the floor, and hosting social gatherings about once a month so workers can feel more connected.
- To meet esteem needs, Maria acknowledges workers through a “producer of the month” award that goes to the employee with the fewest defects and fastest production. She emphasizes improvement in performance reviews and acknowledges effort while on the factory floor.
- Finally, Maria shows an interest in each worker’s ambitions, even if they are not directly related to their work at Gordon’s Bicycle Company. For those who do want to pursue careers within the company or within operations, she makes sure training and guidance are provided.
Similar to Maslow’s theory, Alderfer’s ERG theory compresses Maslow’s needs into three main needs: existence needs, relatedness needs, and growth needs (hence, ERG), which can be met in a similar way as described in Maslow’s hierarchy. A key development of ERG theory is recognizing more fluidity between levels, such as people forming social connections to meet physiological needs or attaining status (ego and esteem needs) to meet social needs.
David McClelland and his colleagues at Harvard University performed further research on human needs in the 1960s and developed learned needs theory. In this model, human needs are organized into three categories:
Understanding these human needs in operations management can help us become better managers and leaders. If we can identify one of these three drivers in each of our employees, we can more effectively manage and motivate them.
Motivator-hygiene theory, proposed by Frederick Herzberg in the 1950s, offers a two-factor model for understanding employee motivation. According to Herzberg, there are two categories of factors that influence employee motivation:
EXAMPLE
Suppose Ellen is the general manager of a restaurant. She gives everyone a pay raise and is surprised that people aren’t more motivated to come to work. In this case, Ellen attempted to motivate people based on hygiene factors, rather than motivators. Suppose Ellen gives a pay raise but also decides to offer management training programs and sets up a pathway for servers to work into management positions in the franchise. This is what is likely motivating to people, not the pay raise alone.The important thing to remember about this theory is the fact that hygiene factors must be present, otherwise employees may experience dissatisfaction. Motivational factors are those factors that align with personal goals like the need for growth, challenge, and recognition.
The content theories above discuss what motivates people. In contrast, process theories try to understand motivation at a psychological level. For example, a process theory might explain why the same motivators work in one workplace and don’t in another.
EXAMPLE
Say Brenda is in a job where she has her needs met: fair pay and benefits, social recognition, and opportunities for growth. However, she has little motivation and struggles to get her work done. She is often distracted. She finally leaves and takes another job doing similar work for similar pay and benefits. However, now she is highly motivated. The work and extrinsic motivators are the same, so what’s the difference? That is what a process-based theory tries to answer.One process-based theory is equity theory, a key concept in organizational behavior that states individuals are motivated by a sense of fairness in the organization or are demotivated by a sense of unfairness. This theory suggests that people assess their inputs (contributions) and outcomes (rewards) in relation to others' inputs and outcomes within the same organization.
EXAMPLE
Suppose at the first job, Brenda knew that male coworkers were doing the same job for more money. Although she felt her own pay was in line with the market for her skills, the perception of sexism and unfairness in compensation undermined her ability to be motivated by pay and benefits, or even take pleasure in the job.When individuals perceive that their input-to-outcome ratio is equal to that of others, they feel satisfied. However, when they believe that their ratio is unequal to that of others, they experience inequity. This inequity can lead to various motivational consequences, such as reduced effort, increased absenteeism, or high job turnover.
To restore balance, the individuals facing the inequity may engage in several strategies. They may adjust their inputs by working harder or less, or they may attempt to change their outcomes by asking for a raise, seeking additional benefits, or changing jobs (as Brenda did).
Alternatively, they may distort their perceptions of their own or others' inputs or outcomes.
EXAMPLE
Brenda might have found some justification for the discrepancy, such as recognizing that while the men in her position did the same work, they all had MBAs, while she did not.Understanding equity theory is crucial for organizations. First, they must recognize that motivation is influenced by equity and make sure the workplace is indeed equitable. However, they must remember that perceptions of inequity are what influence motivation, meaning that there should be transparency about compensation, qualifications, and performance, and they should provide opportunities for employees to voice concerns and ensure that rewards are aligned with contributions.
EXAMPLE
Say Brenda has the opportunity to voice her discontentment over inequity in pay. Managers acknowledge that there is a pay discrepancy, not from intentional sexism, but because the men negotiated a higher salary when they started. But because this is not fair to Brenda, they redesign their compensation model so that starting salaries are set and raises are fixed.Expectancy theory is a motivational theory that states that individuals are more likely to exert effort when they believe their effort will lead to performance (expectancy), that performance will lead to rewards (instrumentality), and that the rewards are valuable to them (valence). When all three factors are high, individuals are more motivated to exert effort.
IN CONTEXT
Suppose a small plumbing company is short staffed, and they really want to get some trainees licensed to do plumbing work on their own. To meet this goal, the company offers to give each trainee $150 to take the test and obtain a license within the next month. One trainee considers the offer.However, suppose the company offers to tutor her and help her prepare and will give the bonus pass or fail as long as she gives an honest effort. Furthermore, suppose the plumbing company will reward her with a permanent promotion if she is a licensed plumber, with a pay raise and bonus.
- She does not feel confident that she will pass the exam if she takes it, even if she sets aside time to study for it.
- She is thus not confident she will get the reward, since it is only promised to those who pass the exam.
- The money is desirable but not enough to make the commitment.
This improves her expectancy; with the tutoring from experts, she feels more confident she will pass the test. The instrumentality is better because she will get the small reward even if her hard work doesn't pay off. Finally, the valence is excellent since she will attain permanent and significant improvements to her position and compensation.
The bottom line in the expectancy theory, like equity theory, is about perceptions. To be motivated, workers must be confident that they can meet the necessary performance goal, that the company will follow through as promised, and that the reward is valuable.
While there are many other theories we could discuss, this tutorial only touches on some of the methods to consider when motivating employees, to reduce turnover and increase productivity. Other methods for motivation include considerations related to:
Managers can work with individuals to find their personal motivators, identify performance goals inside their locus of control, and find appropriate rewards that motivate them. When applied effectively, employee motivation can increase employee satisfaction, reduce turnover, increase productivity, and help organizations create high-quality products and services.
Source: This tutorial has been adapted from Saylor Academy and NSCC “Operations Management”. Access for free at https://pressbooks.nscc.ca/operationsmanagement2/. License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.