Table of Contents |
In order to examine some of the ways in which crime and justice are constructed in media representations, we will begin by discussing framing, a key concept in media studies. We will then look at some examples of ways in which criminal offenses and offenders, victims of crime, and criminal justice personnel and their actions are framed in media coverage.
Think of a picture in a frame. The frame sets the limits of what you can see, and you do not necessarily know the context outside of what appears in the image within the frame. You do not have access to the broader background. You do not know if there are more people present than those you see within the frame. You rely on the facial expressions of those in the picture to understand how it feels.
Likewise, in media framing, the media offer the audience a snapshot of events, and there is always something left out of the frame.
Frames are the focus (a parameter or boundary) for discussing a particular event. Frames focus on what will be discussed, how it will be discussed, and, above all, how it will not be discussed. Framing is not neutral:
Here are some of the ways in which stories can be framed to give them greater prominence in newspapers:
EXAMPLE
A man killed his wife. He was upset about their impending divorce. He used his weapon. The police have arrested him.In contrast, thematic frames discuss events in their broader context.
EXAMPLE
An instance of a man killing his wife could be discussed as part of a broader pattern of violence against women in society or, at the very least, as the culmination of a pattern of abuse within their relationship. Such a story is more complex and meaningful in terms of understanding why such events take place in our society.Research on the media coverage of domestic homicides suggests that the media rely on episodic formats, blame victims for the incident (e.g., arguments they had with the perpetrator, what the victim did to provoke the attack, promiscuous behavior, or why the victim did not leave), provide excuses for the perpetrators’ behavior (e.g., mental state, financial problems, intoxication, or inability to control their emotions), but they fail to convey the broader context. Domestic homicides are generally deemed less newsworthy and tend to receive less coverage and less striking coverage than non-domestic homicides (Wong & Lee, 2018).
Following the idea that news stories are selected based on the newsworthiness criteria, a clear tendency emerges with respect to crime news: The rarest crimes receive the most coverage, while the most common crimes rarely receive coverage. As such, violent crimes, and especially murders or violent crimes committed by women, are vastly overrepresented in crime coverage and in the media, whereas the much more prevalent property crimes are underrepresented.
In addition, crimes that are particularly dramatic, sensational, or bizarre are more likely to be covered in the media. This situation leaves the audience (who rely on media for information) with a distorted picture of crime that is practically the opposite of the reality of crime occurring in our society—this is referred to as the backward law.
Not only is the crime portrayed in the media out of proportion to its actual occurrence in society, but there is also an emphasis on particular groups of offenders and victims:
EXAMPLE
Gushue et al. (2018) examined newspaper coverage pertaining to Jamie, Jonathan, and Jarrod Bacon from 2004 to 2015. The coverage generally portrayed them as sophisticated and powerful gang members who posed a significant public safety risk because of their dangerous enemies. The most commonly occurring keyword in the coverage was “brother,” and the coverage portrayed the brothers as a family, not as individuals. Information about different brothers was mentioned in articles about a single brother, even when this information was irrelevant. Shows of family support were also emphasized, creating the image of a Sopranos-like crime family.The framing of issues along lines of race can also be observed in the media coverage of opioid overdose deaths, as can the framing of issues along lines of class. Criminologists Webster et al. (2020) argue that White and middle-class people who become addicted are portrayed as innocent victims, and efforts are made within the coverage to distinguish these users from “street users.” The focus of the coverage is on “normal,” White, middle-class young people from “good families” who overdose.
EXAMPLE
These stories include photographs and interviews with family and friends. These young people are portrayed as innocent victims of evil drug dealers and foreign drug manufacturers.On the other hand, such coverage ignores the severity of the problem among other populations. Opioid addiction in minority communities is presented as a chronic community issue, and few personal stories or photos are used.
Just as media portrayals of offenders rely on stereotypes, so too do portrayals of victims. Christie (1986, p. 18) argued that there are certain types of people who “when hit by crime—most readily are given the complete and legitimate status of being a victim.” He referred to being given this status at the societal level, but we certainly see the ideal victim stereotype play out in the media as well. He described an ideal victim as one who would be perceived as weak, was confronted by a “big and bad” offender, was engaged in respectable activities, could not possibly be blamed for their victimization, was unacquainted with the person who harmed them, and had sufficient social power to have their victim status recognized and to receive sympathy.
EXAMPLE
Kilty and Frigon (2016) examined the extensive media coverage of serial killers Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo’s three known victims: Tammy Homolka, Leslie Mahaffy, and Kristen French. Although all three victims were young White women, Kristen French, who was kidnapped while walking home from school, most closely conformed to the ideal victim stereotype. During the period they studied, they found over five times more articles about the murder of Kristen French than about the murder of Tammy Homolka, who was related to her attackers. There were also about 20% more stories about Kristen French than about Leslie Mahaffy, who was coming home past curfew on the night she was abducted by Homolka and Bernardo.In contrast to these young White victims, some victims do not receive nearly as much, if any, media coverage of their assaults, sexual assaults, disappearances, and murders. A large number of Indigenous women and girls have gone missing and been murdered in the United States and Canada over the last several decades. The media have been slow to cover these cases, and the coverage has been underwhelming.
EXAMPLE
In examining the coverage of the missing and murdered women from Downtown Eastside in Vancouver, Canada, Jiwani and Young (2006) explained that these victims did not conform to the ideal victim stereotype: They were minority women in the wrong place at the wrong time and engaged in activities that would not be considered “respectable.” The examination of the limited news coverage (128 stories) of these cases found that these stories were framed for viewers as:Such frames offer very little understanding of what happened and why. The authors describe what was virtually absent from the coverage: the larger structural context of these women’s lives, colonialism, racism, sexism, the condition of the women’s homes and communities, and the broader issue of violence against women.
IN CONTEXT
Gilchrist (2010) examined press coverage of six missing and murdered women, none of whom were known to be involved in the sex trade and none of whose families believed had run away. Three of them were Indigenous women, and three were White women. There were 3.5 times fewer stories about the disappearances and deaths of the Indigenous women. Not only were the White women’s cases mentioned much more often, but they also included lengthier articles, were more likely to appear on the front page and in the front sections of the newspaper, the headlines referred to them by name, included emotional messages from family and friends, and were accompanied by more and larger photographs.
Victim-blaming discourses, with regard to the Indigenous women, were included in the coverage and often blamed the victims for their behaviors or attributes (e.g., how they were dressed, where they were, and what they were doing) such that any empathy the public may have felt for the Indigenous women was somehow muted.
The term “missing White woman syndrome” refers to the phenomena described in the last example. Certain people who go missing are more likely to have their cases reported in the media and more likely to receive extensive coverage. The intersectionality of race, gender, and class appears to enter into the differential valuation of various victims. The message the media send with such discrepancies in coverage is that some lives are more valuable than others and the audience will care more about certain victims than others. It also signals to perpetrators which targets are easier and that some victims are more deserving of our collective sympathy and (search/police) resources.
As noted earlier, the police and media have a mutually beneficial relationship that allows the police to be the primary definers of crime news. Their views will be presented first, more regularly, and with authority. Those who come into conflict with the police may have a difficult time having their views represented in mainstream media.
However, in recent years, we have seen instances in which the hierarchy of credibility shifts away from the police, particularly when police misbehavior is captured by “citizen journalists” and disseminated to the public. Images and video of the deaths of citizens at the hands of police can indicate to the public that the police are the problem. When people post videos on social media, police behaviors are depicted as “brutality” and in violation of civil rights.
Such shifts in representations of police behavior may also depend on the political orientation of the news outlets publishing the information.
IN CONTEXT
Chama (2019) compared the views of readers of two New York tabloids on their representation of instances of police brutality and the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement more generally. The New York Post, criticized for being highly sensational and displaying conservative bias, was felt by readers to offer a generally more unfavorable portrayal of BLM.
The newspaper blamed the movement for confrontations with the police and tended to portray Black people as criminals, White people as victims, and the police as good people who were justified in their actions against Black people. The New York Daily News, while also quite sensational, was seen by readers as offering more positive representations of African Americans and a more positive view of BLM, while portraying the police as racist and dysfunctional and questioning police behavior.
We can also see negative and distorted images of the police in entertainment media, where the police have little influence over media content.
There are three main stereotypes of the police that have been developed in crime films over time:
EXAMPLE
Huey and Broll (2015) interviewed 31 police investigators about the ways in which certain aspects of their job were portrayed in television crime shows. While some acknowledged that the media portrayals of police work did contribute to their career choice, they also admitted that the reality of their work had little to do with the sanitized, glamorous, exciting image of police investigations seen in shows such as CSI. The officers interviewed talked about bad smells, combing through trash, being sleep deprived, being covered in grime from blood and fingerprinting dust, having to wear masks and other protective equipment, and being sweaty and uncomfortable.These behind-the-scenes aspects of the reality of police work may not be as appealing to the media audience without first being “cleaned up” by the media producers.
Source: THIS TUTORIAL HAS BEEN ADAPTED FROM KWANTLEN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY’S “INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINOLOGY.” ACCESS FOR FREE AT kpu.pressbooks.pub/introcrim/ LICENSE: CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4.0 INTERNATIONAL
REFERENCES
Chama, B. (2019). The Black Lives Matter movement, crime and police brutality: Comparative study of New York Post and New York Daily News. European Journal of American Culture, 38(3), 201–216. doi.org/10.1386/ejac_00002_1
Chan, W., & Mirchandani, K. (Eds.). (2002). Crimes of colour: Racialization and the criminal justice system in Canada. University of Toronto Press.
Christie, N. (1986). The ideal victim. In E. Fattah (Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy (pp. 17–30). Macmillan.
Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 10, 155–173. doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairbairn, J., & Dawson, M. (2013). Canadian news coverage of intimate partner homicide: Analyzing changes over time. Feminist Criminology, 8(3), 147–176. doi.org/10.1177/1557085113480824
Fleras, A. (2011). The media gaze: Representations of diversity in Canada. UBC Press.
Gilchrist, K. (2010). “Newsworthy” victims?: Exploring differences in Canadian local press coverage of missing/murdered Aboriginal and White women. Feminist Media Studies, 10(4), 373–390. doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2010.514110
Gushue, K., Lee, C., Gravel, J., & Wong, J. S. (2018). Familiar gangsters: Gang violence, brotherhood, and the media’s fascination with a crime family. Crime & Delinquency, 64, 1612–1635. doi.org/10.1177/0011128716686340
Huey, L., & Broll, R. (2015). “I don’t find it sexy at all”: Criminal investigators’ views of media glamorization of police ‘dirty work.’ Policing and Society, 25(2), 236–247. doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.864654
Intravia, J., & Pickett, J. T. (2019). Stereotyping online? Internet news, social media, and the racial typification of crime. Sociological Forum, 34(3), 616–642. doi.org/10.1111/socf.12515
Jiwani, Y., & Young, M. L. (2006). Missing and murdered women: Reproducing marginality in news discourse. Canadian Journal of Communication, 31(4), 895–917. web.archive.org/web/20160314230220/http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/viewFile/1825/1932
Kilty, J. M., & Frigon, S. (2016). The enigma of a violent woman: A critical examination of the case of Karla Homolka. Routledge.
Webster, F., Rice, K., & Sud, A. (2020). A critical content analysis of media reporting on opioids: The social construction of an epidemic. Social Science & Medicine, 244, Article e3112642. doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112642
Wong, J. S., & Lee, C. (2018). Extra! Extra! The importance of victim–offender relationship in homicide newsworthiness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9-10), 4186–4206. doi.org/10.1177/0886260518789142