Table of Contents |
Remember that the crime control and due process models represent two opposing frameworks for understanding the administration of justice. Each model reflects different priorities:
One of the most significant forces shaping the future of the crime control and due process models is the advancement of technology, especially regarding:
For the crime control model, technological advancements in law enforcement could lead to more effective crime prevention and investigation (Rigano, 2018). Technologies such as facial recognition software, predictive policing algorithms, and data-driven surveillance systems can increase the efficiency of identifying and apprehending offenders. The ability to gather, analyze, and cross-reference large datasets allows police to detect patterns and anticipate criminal behavior, potentially reducing crime rates.
However, the increasing reliance on technology for crime control also raises concerns about the erosion of privacy and civil liberties (The Impact of Technology on Policing, 2019). The expansion of surveillance networks and data collection by law enforcement may lead to violations of due process rights, particularly the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Future outcomes will likely involve legal challenges to the use of invasive technologies and a reevaluation of the boundaries between public safety and individual rights.
EXAMPLE
The use of predictive policing tools, which use algorithms to forecast where crimes are likely to occur or identify potential suspects, could streamline crime control efforts. But the accuracy and fairness of these tools are often called into question, particularly regarding biases in the data that can disproportionately target marginalized communities (Lau, 2020).Courts will increasingly need to balance the benefits of these technologies against concerns over racial profiling, privacy violations, and the risk of wrongful convictions based on faulty or biased data.
Technology can also be a powerful tool for enhancing due process protections.
EXAMPLE
The increasing use of body cameras by law enforcement provides a record of police interactions with suspects, which can be critical in assessing the legality of arrests, searches, and interrogations (Chapman, 2018).However, the use of technology in the courtroom also presents due process challenges.
EXAMPLE
Reliance on digital evidence and artificial intelligence in legal proceedings raises questions about transparency and accountability.Defendants may have difficulty challenging algorithmic decisions if the underlying technology is patented, leading to concerns that technological tools could undermine the adversarial nature of the court system (Lartey, 2024).
Looking ahead, the future of due process will likely involve a greater focus on ensuring that technologies used in both law enforcement and the courts are subject to rigorous oversight, transparency, and fairness. Courts may be tasked with developing new standards for the admissibility and scrutiny of technology-driven evidence, as well as safeguarding defendants' rights to challenge the accuracy and fairness of such tools (How to Determine the Admissibility of AI-generated Evidence in Courts, 2023).
Political ideologies and social movements influence the balance between crime control and due process in the criminal justice system. Shifts in public attitudes toward crime, law enforcement, and individual rights can reshape policies, legal interpretations, and court decisions. The future of these models will likely be shaped by ongoing debates about public safety, racial justice, and criminal justice reform.
In periods of rising crime rates or increased public fear of crime, political pressures often favor the crime control model. Policymakers may prioritize tough-on-crime policies, such as mandatory minimum sentences, three-strikes laws, and expanded police powers, to address public concerns about safety (Hernández, 2024). Historically, such measures have led to harsher sentencing practices, reduced judicial discretion, and an emphasis on punishment over rehabilitation.
Moving forward, political trends toward crime control could be worsened by national security concerns, particularly in the context of terrorism or cybercrime.
EXAMPLE
The expansion of laws aimed at preventing domestic terrorism could lead to increased surveillance and reduced procedural protections for people suspected of serious threats to public safety (Taitz, 2023).However, an overemphasis on crime control can lead to mass incarceration, the erosion of civil liberties, and the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities (Beckett & Francis, 2020). Therefore, future policies that lean too much toward crime control will likely face resistance from civil rights organizations, criminal justice reform advocates, and legal professionals concerned with the fairness and equity of the system.
EXAMPLE
Following 9/11, the expansion of anti-terrorism laws led to increased surveillance under the Patriot Act, sparking debates about civil liberties and the potential for government overreach.In contrast, social movements advocating for racial justice, police accountability, and the reduction of mass incarceration have led to a resurgence of interest in the due process model.
EXAMPLE
The Black Lives Matter movement has drawn attention to issues of racial profiling, police brutality, and the over-policing of minority communities, leading to calls for reform in policing practices and the protection of civil rights (Hatfield, 2023).The future of due process protections in the courts will likely be shaped by continued advocacy for reforms that reduce disparities in how the criminal justice system treats different demographic groups. Efforts to end cash bail, eliminate mandatory minimum sentences, and expand diversion programs reflect a shift toward policies that prioritize fairness and equity over punishment (Lattimore et al., 2021).
The courts may increasingly be asked to reconsider legal precedents that prioritize crime control over due process, especially in cases where constitutional rights have been violated.
EXAMPLE
Recent Supreme Court rulings addressing issues like the Fourth Amendment's application to digital privacy suggest that courts will play a central role in defining the future balance between these two models (Wessler, 2019).Criminal justice reform efforts, particularly those aimed at addressing systemic issues such as mass incarceration, racial disparities, and police misconduct, will continue to influence the relationship between crime control and due process in the courts.
One of the most significant reform movements in recent years has been the push to reduce mass incarceration, particularly for nonviolent offenses. Sentencing reform, including the elimination of mandatory minimums for drug offenses, the expansion of parole and probation, and the adoption of alternative sentencing programs, has shifted the focus from punishment to rehabilitation and reintegration (Porter, 2022).
These changes reflect a movement away from the strict crime control model, which emphasized long sentences and punitive measures, toward a more balanced approach that incorporates elements of due process. Courts have increasingly adopted restorative justice practices, which prioritize repairing harm caused by criminal behavior and engaging victims, offenders, and the community in finding solutions (Beitsch, 2016). These practices represent a departure from the traditional adversarial model of criminal justice.
As decarceration and sentencing reform gain momentum, future court proceedings will likely involve more emphasis on rehabilitation, diversion programs, and alternatives to incarceration (Porter, 2023). Courts may become more proactive in overseeing the implementation of these reforms and ensuring that they are applied equitably.
Reforms aimed at improving police accountability are also reshaping the relationship between law enforcement and the courts (The White House, 2022).
EXAMPLE
The use of body cameras and the implementation of civilian review boards are creating new ways for holding law enforcement accountable for misconduct.As courts play a central role in deciding cases of police brutality and excessive force, they may increasingly be required to balance crime control objectives with due process protections for individuals targeted by law enforcement.
In the future, courts will likely see an increase in cases challenging law enforcement practices, particularly in relation to surveillance, the use of force, and racial profiling. These cases will test the courts’ ability to find a way to balance ensuring public safety and upholding civil liberties, potentially leading to new legal standards and precedents that prioritize accountability over unchecked crime control measures (Balancing Security and Freedom, 2024).
Source: THIS TUTORIAL WAS AUTHORED BY SOPHIA LEARNING. PLEASE SEE OUR TERMS OF USE
REFERENCES
Balancing Security and Freedom: A Deep Dive - U.S. Constitution.net. (2024, June 30). Usconstitution.net. www.usconstitution.net/national-security-vs-civil-liberties/
Beckett, K., & Francis, M. M. (2020). The Origins of Mass Incarceration: The Racial Politics of Crime and Punishment in the Post–Civil Rights Era. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16(1), 433–452. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110819-100304
Beitsch, R. (2016, July 21). States consider restorative justice as alternative to mass incarceration. PBS NewsHour. www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/states-consider-restorative-justice-alternative-mass-incarceration
Butler, J. M. (2023). Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019–2022. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 6.
Chapman, B. (2018, November 14). Body-Worn Cameras: What the Evidence Tells Us. National Institute of Justice. nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/body-worn-cameras-what-evidence-tells-us
Hatfield, J. (2023, July 12). 8 facts about Black Lives Matter. Pew Research Center. www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/12/8-facts-about-black-lives-matter/
Hernández, A. (2024, March 18). “Tough-on-crime” policies are back in some places that had reimagined criminal justice • Stateline. Stateline. stateline.org/2024/03/18/tough-on-crime-policies-are-back-in-some-places-that-had-reimagined-criminal-justice/
How to Determine the Admissibility of AI-generated Evidence in Courts? (2023). Unesco.org. www.unesco.org/en/articles/how-determine-admissibility-ai-generated-evidence-courts
Lartey, J. (2024, February 10). Your AI Lawyer is Here. But is the Legal System Ready? The Marshall Project. www.themarshallproject.org/2024/02/10/ai-artificial-intelligence-attorney-court
Lattimore, P., Spohn, C., & DeMichele, M. (2021, April). A better path forward for criminal justice: Reimagining pretrial and sentencing. Brookings. www.brookings.edu/articles/a-better-path-forward-for-criminal-justice-reimagining-pretrial-and-sentencing/
Lau, T. (2020, April 1). Predictive Policing Explained. Brennan Center for Justice. www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/predictive-policing-explained
Porter, N. D. (2023, December 20). Top Trends in Criminal Legal Reform, 2023. The Sentencing Project. www.sentencingproject.org/publications/top-trends-in-criminal-legal-reform-2023/
Porter, N. D. (2022, December 14). Top Trends in Criminal Justice Reform, 2022. The Sentencing Project. www.sentencingproject.org/fact-sheet/top-trends-in-criminal-justice-reform-2022/
Rigano, C. (2018). Using artificial intelligence to address criminal justice needs. National Institute of Justice. nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/using-artificial-intelligence-address-criminal-justice-needs
Taitz, S. (2023, April 11). Five Things to Know About NSA Mass Surveillance and the Coming Fight in Congress | ACLU. American Civil Liberties Union; American Civil Liberties Union. www.aclu.org/news/national-security/five-things-to-know-about-nsa-mass-surveillance-and-the-coming-fight-in-congress
The Impact of Technology on Policing: Balancing Innovation with Civil Liberties — OCJR. (2019). Okjusticereform.org. www.okjusticereform.org/blog/the-impact-of-technology-on-policing-balancing-innovation-with-civil-liberties
The White House. (2022, May 25). Executive Order on Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety. The White House. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/05/25/executive-order-on-advancing-effective-accountable-policing-and-criminal-justice-practices-to-enhance-public-trust-and-public-safety/
Wessler, N. (2019, June 28). The Supreme Court’s Most Consequential Ruling for Privacy in the Digital Age, One Year In | News & Commentary. American Civil Liberties Union. www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/supreme-courts-most-consequential-ruling-privacy-digital
