Table of Contents |
Recall that there are five different conflict styles. Competing is a conflict resolution style in which one party prioritizes his/her needs over others.
As a style, competing is:
As the concept of competing is based on the idea of clear winners and losers, it’s easy to see why this style favors a high amount of assertiveness and a low amount of cooperativeness.
Let's look at some examples of competing as a conflict style.
EXAMPLE
War stands out as an example since it almost always involves a clear winner and loser.EXAMPLE
Think about a boycott or other form of nonviolent resistance. You could be boycotting regulations that you don’t think are good for a particular group of people and you're trying to protect that group’s civil rights. In this sense, you are competing against the powers that are trying to put regulations in place because you don't agree with them.This particular style of conflict has, as all styles do, both positive and negative outcomes.
A positive outcome is a resolution to a conflict that a party perceives as meeting his or her needs and/or reducing the likelihood of further conflict.
A negative outcome is a resolution that the party perceives as not meeting his or her needs and/or increasing the likelihood of further conflict.
Return to the previous examples:
Example | Positive Outcome | Negative Outcome |
---|---|---|
War | Freedom can sometimes be a positive result. For example, the American Revolution led to the freedom of the United States. | Violence is obviously a large negative result. |
Nonviolent resistance | You preserve the rights of a particular group of people. | Perhaps you don’t see any if you win this. You feel that this was a moral endeavor, and winning is positive. You don’t consider there to be any negative outcomes here, and in some cases, there really might not be. |
Source: This tutorial was authored by Sophia Learning. Please see our Terms of Use.